Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Home > Physics > A Mystery of Einstein’s Relativity Has Been Resolved And It Broke Physics

A Mystery of Einstein’s Relativity Has Been Resolved And It Broke Physics

They’re called “laws” on purpose. You should break the tenets that influence the universe to work. So when specialists from the University of Glasglow observed what seemed, by all accounts, to be an essential logical inconsistency in Einstein’s (and Galileo’s) material science, they got stressed. And afterward they got the chance to work settling it.

An entirely imperative one, things being what they are. This is what was going on. The paper by Matthias Sonnleitner, Nils Trautmann, and Stephen M. Barnett depicted how they’d watched that when iotas in movement transmitted little blasts of light, they some of the time created another, rubbing esque power. Whenever indistinguishable (yet stationary) particles were incited to release light bars, there was no relating power. It won’t not appear like a major ordeal, but rather material science depends on the fundamental supposition that the standards of the universe are reliable — shouldn’t change since you’re moving.

To get to the base of the riddle, a similar group initially set out to distinguish where the additional vitality was originating from. Also, this is the place it truly began knocking our socks off. The mystery is that the photons that go taking off these iotas demonstration both as particles and as waves, and as waves, they are liable to the Doppler impact. For this situation, what the analysts found was that the vitality of the photons spat out in a forward-moving heading would be higher than the vitality of a photon shot out the iota’s backend. Since all bodes well — yet despite everything it leaves the universe with some abundance vitality that didn’t appear to originate from anyplace.



The issue may have been wrapped up in the vitality mass perplexity of general relativity, however the analysts discovered their answer by backpedaling to a standard condition in traditional material science: p = mv. Energy (p) is equivalent to mass (m) times speed (v). Presently, the way that you run this figuring quite often includes keeping the mass static while the speed changes, since generally the mass wouldn’t change enough to have an important impact. Yet, on account of these little iotas, taking into consideration the mass to change represented the abundance energy.In different words, what the specialists found was another approach to touch base at the conclusion that mass and vitality are compatible. What they found had the symptom of demonstrating the hypothesis of relativity as opposed to undermining it. Furthermore, we would all be able to inhale a murmur of alleviation that material science truly works.

2 thoughts on “A Mystery of Einstein’s Relativity Has Been Resolved And It Broke Physics

  1. see here: Einstein won the battle against quantum mechanics. In my books (2008-2016, one Springer (Germany) 2016), I showed that “quantum mechanics” is a pseudo-theory constructed within the “unicorn-world” (“universe”, “world”)! Empirically, quantum mechanics has great results. However, there have been various theoretical “interpretations” to QM. (See Rosenblum and Kuttner Quantum enigma – Physics encounters consciousness, 2006 or Tegmark, Max and Wheeler, John Archibald (2001), “100 years of quantum mysteries”, Scientific American, 284/2, pp. 68–75) The titles indicate exactly the “mysteries” of QM. In reality the framework of QM has been wrong all this century! My discovery of the EDWs (2002, 2003, 2005, 2006 (the first application of the perspective to the QM), 2008 (first book) and later until 2016 – Springer’s book) (my first FIVE books are FREE at my webpage, all English) solved the main “QM mysteries” and other great mysteries in philosophy (of mind), cognitive neuroscience, and even biology (the definition of “life” in relationship to “organism”).

    However, according to my approach, the EDWs perspective, QM is a pseudo-theory! (See this idea in my Springer’s book 2016) The explanation of nonlocality (and many other quantum problematic notions) in my book published at Springer (Germany) in 2016. Also, see FIVE books FREE (2008-2014) at my webpage: in my works, I showed that quantum mechanics is wrong. Also, I indicated the ontology of special and general relativity. With my EDWs perspective, Einstein finally won his fight against quantum physicists! Also, in 2015, I showed that space and time cannot even exist.
    Until me, everybody has been working within the wrong framework the “world/universe”. For the first time in the history of human thinking, I showed that the world (unicorn world, as I called) is a wrong notion. I discovered the “epistemologically different worlds” (EDWs). In this way, I showed that
    – the quantum problems are in fact pseudo-problems (everybody placed the wave and the particle in the same “world”/universe which does not exist
    – the mind-brain problem is a pseudo-problem (everybody placed the mind and the brain within the same world but the mind is an EW, the brain belongs to the macro-EW where are the planets).
    – Many other philosophical or scientific became pseud-problems.
    – Don’t forget: „I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actual philosophy.” (Max Born) These words were mainly about QM! He was right, and the problem is that physicists have not believed him (except those who have plagiarized my ideas!)

    For me: (a) the “multiverse” (Physics) means that all universes are in the same macro-EW, that is, they have still worked within the unicorn world. (b) Spinoza worked within the unicorn world with one substance with “different attributes”. (c) Everybody has worked within the “universe”/unicorn world. Until me, NOBODY denied the “world”/unicorn world!

    The brain does not exist for the mind, the mind does not exist for the brain but both exist in EDWs: the microparticles belong to the micro-EW, the macroparticles to macro-EW, the elmagnetic waves to wave-EW, your mind is an EW, the brain belongs to the macro-EW. see this idea here:

    Gabriel Vacariu at SPRINGER (Germany): (2016) ILLUSIONS OF HUMAN THINKING: ON CONCEPTS OF MIND, REALITY, AND UNIVERSE IN PSYCHOLOGY, NEUROSCIENCE, AND PHYSICS, Author: Vacariu, Gabriel. Written by Springer staff:
    • “The Book delivers a new axiomatic-hyperontological framework for a non-contradictory conceptual understanding of ‘Welt’ (‘Universe’)
    • Shows how to solve fundamental and philosophical problems of Science (‘Pseudoproblems’)
    • Gives deep insight into philosophical discussions of Philosophy of Mind, Neurosciences, Psychology, Theory of Relativity, Quantum Mechanics.
    The book illustrates that the traditional philosophical concept of the ‘Universe’, the ‘World’ has led to anomalies and paradoxes in the realm of knowledge. The author replaces this notion by the EDWs perspective, i.e. a new axiomatic hyperontological framework of ‘Epistemologically Different Worlds’ (EDWs). Thus it becomes possible to find a more appropriate approach to different branches of science, such as cognitive neuroscience, physics, biology and the philosophy of mind. The consequences are a better understanding of the mind-body problem, quantum physics non-locality or entanglement, the measurement problem, Einstein’s theory of relativity and the binding problem in cognitive neuroscience.” (here:

    In this book: the new approach regarding quantum problems, the mind-brain problem, the micro-macro problem – reality, “world”, “universe” does not even exist. Something else exist, but for what really exist, the “Epistemologically Different Worlds”. This book is a summary of the main ideas of my books (in English) published in 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2014 and posted at my webpage FREE (and other pages).
    • At my webpage (Philosophy, University of Bucharest), on my EDWs, see my article 2005 Synthese (USA) (several papers 2002-2003 on the same topic) + FIVE books FREE (all English, at my website) each posted on Internet when it was published) on Cognitive (Neuro)science, Physics (quantum mechanics and Einstein’s relativity), Philosophy (of mind), etc.
    • On Amazon, three books: (2017) Self as an Epistemological World (2017, published in Romanian in 2016) + (2016) Dark matter and dark energy, space and time, and other pseudo-notions in cosmology + (2015) Is cognitive neuroscience a pseudoscience? (In my works, since 2005, I showed that CNS is a pseudo-science!!)
    • In book 2014 or 2016, see the ONTOLOGY of Einstein’s special and general theory of relativity within the EDWs perspective!
    Big Bang did not happen. Inflation is a wrong notion. (see my book 2014) In reality, there were many, many Big Bangs in the same time… Before the “universe” (which does not exist, but “epistemologically different worlds” exist), it was an EW that did not exist for our “universe”. I wrote this in 2007 in one of my papers. Also see FIVE books (2008-2014) FREE (and many papers) at my webpage. Book 2016: Dark matter and dark energy, space and time do not exist. However, there has to be something: “Nothing” in our world corresponds to “something” that belongs to an “epistemologically different world”. Last year, I explained the “relationship” of dark matter connecting two galaxies. On Amazon: “Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu (2016) DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY, SPACE AND TIME, AND OTHER PSEUDO-NOTIONS IN COSMOLOGY” (also my 5 books FREE (in English) at my webpage

  2. los anГЎlogos hay?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: